Strictly Logical Physics
Climate Change
Climate Change
Right Now, and since 1957, US Government atmospheric data is collected in 5-liter evacuated glass flasks, every two weeks, at the South Pole (Lat. 89°59’S. Long. 24°48’W.). They are analyzed for CO2 at SIO (Scripps) which shows that the Earth’s atmosphere now contains (over 3 trillion tons). They do that in Antarctica because no trees or businesses or crops or any cities of humans are anywhere near that might affect the precision of their data. (They also collect data on a volcano in Hawaii that is slightly less accurate.)
3,387,181,970, 000 TONS of Carbon Dioxide.
It is a big number, but our activities of burning fossil fuels are causing the total to constantly rise! These are Tons of gases, each comparable in size to entire large houses, enormous amounts! For the record, in the 4.5 billion years the Earth had been around until the year 1800 AD, it had only accumulated about 2 trillion tons of carbon dioxide in its atmosphere.
But after we discovered fossil fuels to dig up and burn, in only two hundred years, our human activities of burning fossil fuels has tremendously increased that total to the much larger number seen above. Around 1830, we discovered how to burn coal (Chemistry: C + O → CO2 + energy) to power the industrial revolution. That coal had been chemically formed 200 million years ago. Around 1860, we discovered even more value when we learned to dig up and burn petroleum (Chemistry: CH + O → CO2 + energy) to power the industrial revolution. That petroleum had also been chemically formed 200 million years ago. Around 1890, we discovered even more available energy in digging up and burning natural gas (CH4) (Chemistry: C + O2 >→ CO2 + energy and H + O2 → H2O + energy) to power the industrial revolution. That natural gas had also been chemically been formed 200 million years ago.
THAT is what is now causing the Global Warming that is such a crisis. Isn’t it remarkable that we have done all this damage in only two hundred years? How might we fix what we have done? Simple. We will! All of the giant Petrochemical companies told us in 2019 that in another TWENTY YEARS we will have found and burned up ALL those fossil fuels which took 200 million years to form under the Earth. Few people seem to think about what we will have to do after the year 2045. We all MUST STOP all burning of all fossil fuels, either by choice or by necessity.
Oh, can I assume that you enjoy breathing? NOBODY seems to have noticed that EVERY ONE of those chemical oxidation formulas for burning fossil fuels has to find a molecule of oxygen from the Earth’s atmosphere, to complete the combustion and release all the energy we lust for. Fortunately, the Earth’s atmosphere has a LOT of oxygen in it (around 20.95%) but still, shouldn’t someone care that by the time that Greta Thunberg’s followers will get to being 80 years old, we WILL have permanently eliminated around 12,000,000,000,000 tons of oxygen from the atmosphere, all to be able to burn fossil fuels? The Earth’s atmosphere will still have a lot of oxygen left in it but if it has dropped to about 19% in it, Greta’s old people may have to forever struggle to breathe.
Oh, all of the “experts” that are coming up with “alternative energy” sources now seem to overlook the fact that many of their “electric cars” and such are still deleting oxygen atoms from the atmosphere! And rich people will still be too greedy to pass up huge profits on handling any remaining fossil fuels, so all the young people who dream of eliminating all burning of fossil fuels (and thereby saving humanity from self-imposed extermination) may still have a grim future ahead of them.
Neutrinos do not exist
(1963)
Like all other nuclear objects, neutrinos must necessarily be standard Vector quantities, as they all have Nuclear Spin, that is, Angular Momentum. All Angular Momentum must add as Vector quantities and not as (directionless) Scalar Quantities. Angular Momentum must always be Conserved.
As shown here, a standard Vector Addition Diagram of the Nuclear Spin of a Neutron’s Beta-Decay happens to be an equilateral triangle. A Neutron’s Spin of 1/2 unit is one (blue) side of that triangle with a Proton’s Spin of 1/2 unit (green) and an Electron’s Spin of 1/2 unit (red) being the other two Vector sides. (as shown in this Vector Addition graphic). There is no issue of any problem with Conservation of Angular Momentum regarding the Nuclear Spin Vector of a Neutron and the consequent Nuclear Spin Vectors of a Proton and Electron.
In 1930, Wolfgang Pauli had erred in thinking that another particle must also exist which had nuclear spin. Pauli wrongly assumed that a (new) fourth particle must also exist, his neutrino, so his (incorrect, Scalar) addition could work. A proper understanding of how Vector Addition works (as in the graphic above) shows that was very wrong.
Pauli had proposed that the only reason that his neutrino must exist was to solve a problem of a failure in the Conservation of Angular Momentum, a problem which did not actually even exist!
As of yet, 2023, no experiment has ever been done which has actually confirmed that any Neutrinos actually exist. It took 25 years after Wolfgang Pauli had (incorrectly) speculated that Neutrinos must exist, before the first claim of an experimental confirmation was made. In 1956, some creative assumptions were made by Reines and Cowan. They devised their own unique detector, which involved detecting protons, neutrons, positrons and electrons (in order to try to prove the existence of a neutral Neutrino). A Nuclear Reactor was found to have produced a handful of unexpected responses in their detector and they announced it as proving the Neutrino. No actual Neutrinos were ever found but instead only a microscopic number of creative sequences of nuclear processes. One of their favorite processes resulted in a burst of gamma radiation, and then, later, another second burst of gamma radiation. Based on a lot of assumptions, Reines and Cowan calculated the time delay they expected between the two gamma radiation bursts. On this, an assumed sequence of nuclear events which resulted in two unique gamma radiation bursts, Reines and Cowan announced that they had proven the existence of a Neutrino. All their experiment had actually proved was that some (unknown) process took place where two gamma ray bursts occurred, where no reference to any Neutrino at all was ever involved. By the way, no neutral Neutrino could ever cause even one gamma ray burst (due to the Conservation of Energy Law). But that specific experiment, inside a nuclear reactor, is still considered the “absolute proof of Neutrinos”. No actual experiment, during the following 60 years has ever (yet) even detected even a single Neutrino.
And even the many assumptions that have been made are incredibly weak. It is acknowledged that a Neutrino has no electric charge. But one of the primary claims of having detected Neutrinos is that Cherenkov Radiation had been created and observed. In my long Physics career, I have certainly done (different) experiments which created Cherenkov Radiation, and it is a unique experience. But only charged particles can create Cherenkov Radiation. That would logically eliminate neutral Neutrinos from the picture. A very bizarre assumption was made where an (electrically neutral) neutrino somehow waves a magic wand to create a negatively charged electron. We Physicists know that such silliness is simply impossible. We know that Electric Charge Must Be Conserved. But that assumption, where a neutral Neutrino somehow creates a negatively charged electron (in order to then cause the observed Cherenkov Radiation), is somehow simply absolutely accepted by Physicists and the world, which then, they declare proves that Neutrinos exist. No they don’t.
Not only have they adopted impossible assumptions, which everyone simply accepts as valid, but even if such a process could occur, they claim that Neutrinos pass through the entire Earth without actually interacting with any atom or object along the way is supposedly only one chance in 2,000,000,000,000. Yet, they claim that in their experiment, the Neutrino didn’t just collide with something big, like a Uranium nucleus, but in the tiniest available target, an electron. To then do a process which violates the Conservation Laws.
The only other experiments that allegedly prove that Neutrinos exist are essentially enormous tanks of liquid Chlorine very deep in mines. In a given year, around three atoms of Chlorine can convert to Argon atoms. The “deep in a mine” phrase is to claim that surface events then could not affect their tank of Chlorine. But they neglect the fact that each of those deep mines are relatively near even deeper concentrations of Radium and Uranium and other radioactive ores in the Earth, which do (directly) cause Cherenkov Radiation and also do interact with Chlorine atoms to create a few Argon atoms. The results they see in their underground experiments may just be absolutely natural events.
There now seems like yet another argument that modern physicists claim as proof of the existence of neutrinos, that the (alleged) neutrino was a source of energy, (not just nuclear spin or angular momentum, which is clearly not true). But in recent years, very accurate NIST data exists regarding all processes and objects exist.
There is yet another total proof that neutrinos cannot exist. All nuclear objects only came into existence when a certain amount of energy became converted into “rest-mass” (per Einstein energy). For example, in a Pair Production Experiment, a photon must start out with an energy of at least 1,022,000 eV so it can spontaneously disappear and a brand new electron suddenly appears, which exists with a rest-mass of 510,998.928 eV and also a brand new anti-electron (also called a positron) also suddenly appears, which also exists with a rest-mass of 510,998.928 eV. This is a very interesting experiment of Graduate Physics students! That peculiar experiment EXACTLY conserves energy! (If the original photon had more energy than that, we Physics students always found that the new electron and positron wound up with brand new kinetic energy, in order to spin around in our magnetic field in our photographs)
In the 1990s, NIST collected really accurate Rest-Mass values for all atomic particles and isotopes, to better than ten-digit accuracy. I spent 7 years in studying that NIST data, and I found some amazing conclusions. To an accuracy of better than ten digits, it appears that a far simpler explanation may exist for nuclear physics. A really simple example seems to be that every Tritium atom (Hydrogen-3) will do a beta-decay over 12.33 years half-life, where it becomes a Helium-3 atom, where all the component parts are precisely accounted for, regarding mass and energy and nuclear spin and everything else. According to NIST data, every decaying Hydrogen/Tritium atom, 3H1, has a precise atomic rest-mass of 3.0160492779 AMU (Atomic Mass Units). The resulting Helium-3 atom, 3He2, has a precise NIST atomic rest-mass of 3.0160293201 AMU. This beta-decay gives off a precise amount of radiation of +0.0000199578 AMU, with a half-life of 12.33 years (where the resulting new electron simply begins to revolve around the new Helium nucleus to maintain it as un-ionized.)
Do the math!
Per currently accepted reasoning and using the latest NIST data:
Tritium Beta-Decay
3H1 → 3He2 + radiation + anti-neutrino
or by energy:
3.0160492779 AMU → 3.0160293201 AMU. + 0.0000199578 AMU + 0.000000000 AMU
Please notice that there is exactly ZERO energy available that could be converted into a neutrino! It does not exist!
Similarly,
Neutron Beta-Decay
N → P + E + radiation + anti-neutrino
or by energy:
1.00866491588 AMU → 1.007276466879 AMU + 0.00054857990946 AMU + 0.00083986909154 AMU + 0.000000000 AMU
The radiation factor here is exactly the same as the Neutron self-binding energy (which is also described as 0.78233 MeV)
Please notice that there is again ZERO energy available that could be converted into a neutrino! It again does not exist!
Using the NIST data, if the Neutron Self-Binding Energy is neglected (inside each atomic nucleus), then the Conservation of all Conservation Laws are precisely true, to better than 10-digit precision. The consequences of this are staggering! Inside atomic nuclei, the electrons and protons must whiz around separaterly and they are not bound together as neutrons, as there are no Neutron Self-Binding Energy in there to hold the neutrons together! (FYI: free-ranging neutrons DO contain the necessary Neutron Self-Binding Energy.)
This amazing precision in every nuclear process seems to be true, always to better than 10-digit precision. That is better than 1 electron Volt accuracy.
These calculations are that precise for thousands of nuclear processes. These all leave ZERO energy to create any alleged neutrinos in any of the reactions, certainly less than 1 eV. Keep in mind that each electron has the energy equivalence of 510,998.928 eV. There really seems to be ZERO energy which exists to create any neutrinos or to give them any kinetic energy to move them anywhere. This is very compelling PROOF that no neutrinos exist!
Carl Johnson, scientist, Thornton, Illinois
Rape Prevention
Every year, more than a million American girls and women get raped. We can protect those million American women from being raped each year.
A Forensic Police DNA Rape Prevention Method
(2018)
Around 3,000 girls and women are raped every day in America. That is more than a million rapes every year. And no one seems to know how to protect them from this crime. We can protect all those girls and women (and children). Every time any man ejaculates, he sends out 250,000,000 separate sperm, each of which contains his unique complete set of DNA molecules. (If he sends out less than 39,000,000 sperm, that is considered by Doctors to be medically inadequate.) Modern Forensic Police can examine any crime scene and if they can identify even just ten of a man’s unique DNA molecules in the crime scene, they know who the criminal was. This is now done every day in identifying criminals.
If a rape victim girl or woman carefully preserves her underwear and clothing, possibly in a sealed Tupperware container, any modern Police Laboratory or Hospital Laboratory can easily find far more than ten of a rapist’s DNA molecules from a rape crime scene, on her underwear or clothing, out of the 250,000,000 DNA of the man who committed the rape. Think about it. How else can the unique DNA of a man’s sperm get on a girl’s underwear in a Police Evidence container?
Once men realized how impossible it is for them to secure all their 250,000,000 of personally identifiable DNA molecules from a rape crime, even the dumbest man will realize that they cannot get away with the crime of rape. All women and girls and children will suddenly be extremely safe from ever being raped again.
For 26 years, I had been a Minister in a Christian Church (A Christ Walk Church). People talk to Ministers about everything! (under total confidentiality). As a result, I eventually came to realize that essentially EVERY WOMAN in our community has been raped several times (with the possible exception of a couple great-grandmothers). So few people seem to ever even been aware of the million women who get raped every year in America to ever even think about the problem. Only the one woman who had just gotten raped seems aware of the crime, and she often does not want to talk to the Police.
Protect Kids in Churches
This Forensic DNA system also works to protect little children in Catholic Churches and Mormon Churches from evil Priests where the Churches do not otherwise know how to protect those millions of kids. Several years ago, I sent a complete description and explanation of this Forensic DNA system of rape prevention to Pope Francis of the Catholic Church in the Vatican and he seemed to really like it. I got three (translated into English) letters back from the Pope! Wow! We just need to teach those kids to save their underwear after such rapes (and preserve them).
Protect Coeds in Colleges
No one seems to know how to protect the millions of college Coeds from being raped. There is evidence that many of those Coeds get raped several times during their four years in College. This Forensic DNA system totally protects every single one of them from ever being raped!
Protect Females in the Military
No one seems to know how to protect the hundreds of thousands of female Soldiers from being raped. There is evidence that many of those girls and women get raped several times during their service in the Military. This Forensic DNA system totally can protect every single one of them from ever being raped!
Carl Johnson, scientist, Thornton, Illinois